6 ms·
I'm not very sure about Word, but Excel 97 onwards, Excel's story around forward and backward compatibility has been very good -- the Excel equivalent of the sc
by signal11 7y ago
I'm not very sure about Word, but Excel 97 onwards, Excel's story around forward and backward compatibility has been very good -- the Excel equivalent of the scenario you describe wouldn't happen, because of the introduction of Future Record Types[1].
These are still used in the newer XLSB format[2].
[1] https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/digformatspecs/Excel97-2007BinaryFileFormat(xls)Specification.pdf https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/digformatsp... (Page 14)
[2] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/office_file_formats/ms-xlsb/abd9c7af-a345-4aaf-999d-8fffa659e6e2?redirectedfrom=MSDN https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/office_file_forma...
- unilynx 7y agoWord, Excel and Powerpoint were forwards and backwards compatible from 1997 to 2004. The newer versions emitted various backward compatible formatting (eg Word 2000 supported table-in-table, but emitted sufficient formatting for Word 97 to at least see one level of tables and consider the rest of the cells to be paragraphs) It was far from bug-free though.