4 ms·
Yes, that'd be a better analogy. My point was that, even if you had the best reconstruction in the world, having to reconstruct from a degraded source is worse
by dr_zoidberg 7y ago
Yes, that'd be a better analogy. My point was that, even if you had the best reconstruction in the world, having to reconstruct from a degraded source is worse than working from a good source to begin with.
- close04 7y agoFrom a practical perspective they don’t have to be perfect or as food as the original, not even close, just good enough. “Good enough” though is also extremely hard to achieve, assuming it’s even possible with this technique.