4 ms·
If this argument is made in public, people will never support debt forgiveness. not only it breaks the social contract with severe entitlement, it's also very h
by buboard 7y ago
If this argument is made in public, people will never support debt forgiveness. not only it breaks the social contract with severe entitlement, it's also very hard to accept that people who can afford harvard or stanford "suffer"
populist emotional arguments are good when there is the populus to empathize with it. the vast majority of people won't care for such "plight".
- asdfman123 7y agoYou have to realize a lot of kids who went to Harvard and Stanford were just smart kids from normal suburban families and middle class homes. And many of them have middle class jobs, just like people with similar SAT scores who went to state schools instead. Be wary of populist urges to tear down people you perceive to be "better" than you because maybe they're really not, or they're not the cause of the problem. Do things that will improve society, not just satiate your urge for blood.
- erikpukinskis 7y agoWhat’s the endgame though? You have the federal government pay UChigago $100k a year times however many kids? And then when UChicago raises the price to $120k, the federal government pays that? Where does it end? I’m not against free college, or debt forgiveness, but sometimes even if you have a goal there’s no regulatory framework that can meet it. If I wanted to prohibit abortions, while discouraging birth control, and ensuring victims of abuse get to control their bodies... well, sorry. There’s just no regulatory framework that can achieve that. Doesn’t matter what I think is “right”.
- buboard 7y agoyeah no, i m not from the US and didn't study there so i don't perceive anyone as better or worse. But if the smartest, non-poor people can't keep their promises and are looking for shortcuts that would really make society worse. Painting what's normal (paying off debts) as "bloody" revenge is pure hyperbole