> Runners and scooter riders are not the same thing at all. Wasn't something that was claimed. It was an analogy to show the absurdity of your argument. > Sec

> Runners and scooter riders are not the same thing at all. Wasn't something that was claimed. It was an analogy to show the absurdity of your argument. > Second, runners do not run everyday, multiple times for every trip and errand. You can grab a scooter for lunch, for an errand, etc multiple times a day. Above you argued speed was the core problem, now it is frequency? You said a post ago that anything on the footpath going "5 to 10mph" is dangerous due to "the kinetic energy and momentum at 10mph of an adult is considerable." Why is that suddenly safer when it is less frequent? You said it could "lead to bone fractures." Bone fractures are fine when runners do it but not scooter users..? Seems like you've forgotten the argument you were making above. > Lastly, it is not the job of pedestrians to accommodate scooters Wasn't something that was claimed.