3 ms·
Is it implicit that these rules apply don't apply to the workplace or other situations that aren't public?
by zwieback 7y ago
Is it implicit that these rules apply don't apply to the workplace or other situations that aren't public?
- danShumway 7y agoThat's a good question. My intention was yes, there is an expectation that if you're renting a computer on behalf of an employer or accessing their internal network, that's a different situation than using a personal device. In the same way, circumventing a captcha to automate logging into an account you own is a right I imagined being protected, but exploiting an XSS vulnerability to scrape private data behind a login is not. I would be open to having my mind changed on where that line is. I'm cautious about trying to nail down a very hard line about what is and isn't 'public', because I see some ambiguity (using a personal device for work, using EULAs to enforce non-disparagement clauses). With Right to Remember, I felt like I needed to at least allude to that distinction: > and archiving information that they have lawful access to. But I didn't feel comfortable drawing hard lines elsewhere. If I found a solid metric that I felt could be easily, universally applied, I'd be willing to adopt it.