3 ms·
I know. It's just an analogy. You can replace it with a better one if you want. The general point I am making is: these are not trying to measure actual job ta
by Gunax 7y ago
I know. It's just an analogy. You can replace it with a better one if you want.
The general point I am making is: these are not trying to measure actual job tasks, but instead measuring something that (they hope) is closely related to, or correlated with one's ability to perform the job. The idea is that if one can do these sorts of problems, one can probably do the actual job at hand.
- jmromer 7y ago> (they hope) is closely related to, or correlated with one's ability to perform the job. The idea is that if one can do these sorts of problems, one can probably do the actual job at hand This is a claim about the intentions behind these practices. Intentions aside, the whole point of this perennially recurring discourse is about effectiveness — that certain overused methods of filtering job candidates are ineffective on their own terms — and negative side effects — that they're biased against people with non-traditional / from underrepresented backgrounds.