4 ms·
I think the right to communicate is a part of a right to freely express oneself, which would be much more meaningful to codify in my opinion.
by shaneprrlt 7y ago
I think the right to communicate is a part of a right to freely express oneself, which would be much more meaningful to codify in my opinion.
- danShumway 7y agoWould you be willing to expand on that? My instinct is to think of self-expression as a subset of communication, so I'd be curious to hear your thoughts on what parts of self-expression aren't currently being encapsulated or covered.
- sixstringtheory 7y agoI'm trying to think of counterexamples to each approach. Can one express oneself without communication? Can one communicate without expressing something about themself, or, slightly more relaxed, without having someone perceive something about them?
- basch 7y agoDoes the right to freely express include spam?
- danShumway 7y agoNot GP, but forcing an email client to consume/host spam would violate their Right to Filter. > Users and communities have the right to share filters, whether those filters take the form of software, algorithms, or manually curated whitelists and blacklists.