Yep, I am aware of that particular case. However, this is not the same issue; a Linux/Chromebook booting into a text processor is better / easier than a typewri

Yep, I am aware of that particular case. However, this is not the same issue; a Linux/Chromebook booting into a text processor is better / easier than a typewriter. In Munich they tried to migrate everything and wanted to have the users use the full desktop and especially reading / writing office files that needed to go elsewhere. Here we are comparing to a typewriter and a fax. That is a massively different case. One computer can handle both the type writer and the fax; the save button of Libre Office can be made (trivially) to just mail (or fax) a PDF etc. You get all the benefits of your typewriter/fax and none of the misery that Munich had. Also the Munich thing was way too early; 2004 was too early. It would be easier now; at the time it was too ambitious. When 2014 came along, no-one was really invested in the idea anymore; more frustrated I would say. However much of a Linux fan I am; I know that some things don't work. If I would be on a council to do those kind of things, I would be looking at a mix of tables, chromebooks, linux machines and windows machines depending on job description and demands. Windows would definitely be the least used of all of those because it simply is not needed for most tasks most people are doing during a work day.