2 ms·
No, you didn't, or at least I interpreted whatever you were trying to say as a red herring. Who in the article makes that insinuation? Who said anything about t
by danso 7y ago
No, you didn't, or at least I interpreted whatever you were trying to say as a red herring. Who in the article makes that insinuation? Who said anything about the paper's purported flawed methodology as automatically validating the "above truth"?
- coldtea 7y ago>Who in the article makes that insinuation? Many people in real life, forums, etc. Who said it had to be in the article? I'm pointing at a larger trend.
- danso 7y agoI don't see how personal grievances and perceptions of "many people in real life" are useful and relevant to the discussion. Just like my many real life experiences with guys being assholes is not useful to discussing this paper and its publication.
- coldtea 7y agoWe're not discussing some mathematical formula. The whole thread is about the political perceptions and opinions of whether such an article should be printed, based on perspectives on various societal issues, plus some meta-discussion on how journals should work. Check out the (at the moment at least) top voted comment: "In case anyone remembers the incident at CERN (...)" etc. And of course that meta discussion is much more useful than wether this individual article is correct or not.