I mean, if the paper does not meet the typical standards for a scientific publication, then obviously publishing it is a bad idea. Note: I am not in any way wh

I mean, if the paper does not meet the typical standards for a scientific publication, then obviously publishing it is a bad idea. Note: I am not in any way whatsoever suggesting that this paper is substandard. I have not read a word of it. Just pointing out that there are definite scenarios where publishing papers, controversial or not, can be a bad thing.