3 ms·
If you are a citizen of a state that is known to coerce its people to work for it, you are not an individual, you're a state-level actor. If you are known to d
by anilakar 7y ago
If you are a citizen of a state that is known to coerce its people to work for it, you are not an individual, you're a state-level actor.
If you are known to directly or indirectly provide assets to a government and said assets are a critical part of the infrastructure, you're responsible for the safety of the government in your dealings.
An American company refusing to recruit people from China is just the US government refusing to hire the Chinese government to run the country, not companies discriminating against individuals. This holds true even if you swap the states in the previous sentence.
For the record, I'm not a citizen of either of the aforementioned countries but my home country has a similar relation with its neighbor.
- jakobegger 7y ago> If you are a citizen of a state that is known to coerce its people to work for it, you are not an individual, you're a state-level actor. You are putting collective blame on a billion people for the actions of their dictatorial government. This is not a reasonable position to hold in a supposedly enlightened society, it is rather just a thinly veiled excuse for run-of-the-mill xenophobia.
- eastendguy 7y agoNobody blames anyone here. The point is that anyone who lives (or has family) in a dictatorship can be easily blackmailed by its own state, with no legal recourse.