4 ms·
> requires significantly more resources to run a public recursive resolver. Do you know of any studies or released cost breakdowns that show this? Depending on
by bluejekyll 7y ago
> requires significantly more resources to run a public recursive resolver.
Do you know of any studies or released cost breakdowns that show this? Depending on your view, DNSSEC might be considered to be operationally more costly. But also modern equipment is pretty good at this task.
- ComodoHacker 7y agoNot for еDNS, but I've seen such reports about HTTPS when it was in the process of wide adoption. In case of DNS, not only more CPU is consumed on encryption, but more memory too, since it's stateful. And all this both with client and upstream.