4 ms·
> "If you look at the vetting processes in the defence sector they have strict nationality and background checks. Why should the same not be true for something
by 490d0aff0ee8 7y ago
> "If you look at the vetting processes in the defence sector they have strict nationality and background checks.
Why should the same not be true for something with a damage multiplier the size of github which is basically carrying a big chunk of commercial IP in private repos?"
I'm all for background checks. Those at-least try to give everyone an equal opportunity - and if you fail them, you'll know why and have a chance to challenge the decision. There is a due process - as opposed to having some random techbro creating "need to get rid of {arbitrary nationality} asap" issues and having a bunch of random employees debating it...
If by having "nationality requirements" you mean "being a US citizen" - then Gitlab will lose 50% of its workforce overnight. The same will be true for many other tech companies. You make it sound like the defense sector is enjoying the strict employment regulations...
- m0xte 7y agoThe issue is not necessarily the background checks but the fact that you can be compelled by the state you reside in after the fact. For example the state could target known employees of GitHub after they are employed and checks passed. I'm not suggesting any national correlation here. I suspect the same is true for Chinese and Russian companies too! As for the defence sector it is not enjoying it, at least in Europe as the incoming staff into the sector are shrivelling up pretty rapidly.