All computers probably are not running Windows 95, many are newer. But I understood the point here is that judges take files home (maybe using floppies?) and us

All computers probably are not running Windows 95, many are newer. But I understood the point here is that judges take files home (maybe using floppies?) and use their own computers to work on them. And when at home, they are not supposed to take local backups, but some did it anyway. It's also suspected that the infection of malware came via a private computer handling the files. Again, Google Translate does a decent job: Infection may be through private computers Many of them have in the past, also because of the often outdated service computers, taken office data on storage media such as USB sticks home and worked there in the home office. The fear of having infected the private computer with the virus is great - and apparently justified. The Federal Office for Information Security advises in case of infection with the Emotet virus to a reorganization of the affected computer. Current information about the virus further states: "Emotet is considered one of the biggest threats of malware worldwide." https://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/schadsoftware-im-berliner-kammergericht-trojaner-angriff-deutlich-schwerer-als-gedacht/25092566.html https://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/schadsoftware-im-berliner...