> That's called "circular arfument" (lol, sic) - you proclaim that this term is racist and prove it by proclaiming - without any evidence - that "most people" (

> That's called "circular arfument" (lol, sic) - you proclaim that this term is racist and prove it by proclaiming - without any evidence - that "most people" (who?) "understand" that it is racist. What you do is just repeating your original - baseless - claim. first, it's whom, not who. second, i didn't claim that it's racist because people know that it's racist. learn from google, learn from teen vogue. https://www.teenvogue.com/story/why-you-shouldnt-use-the-term-illegals https://www.teenvogue.com/story/why-you-shouldnt-use-the-ter... you bring nothing novel or new or clever to this conversation. bye, dude. you're intellectually dishonest. even worse, you're boring.