4 ms·
I assume you didn't read beyond the title, as your point is pretty much the basis of the article. It calls for a wider adoption of the design-thinking, users fi
by httpsterio 7y ago
I assume you didn't read beyond the title, as your point is pretty much the basis of the article. It calls for a wider adoption of the design-thinking, users first mentality and embraces various types of ux designers.
So, the article actually criticises how broad the term ux is and that we should have more specialisation and appreciate that.
- thrower123 7y agoNo, I read the whole thing. It brought to mind the protestations that eliminating dedicated QA teams at Microsoft wouldn't cause any problems, because now quality would be everyone's responsibility.