This is quite poor article, which you can grasp after reading it. Few examples: * quote: "generates ___something___ referred to as the exchange hash H" - in ar

This is quite poor article, which you can grasp after reading it. Few examples: * quote: "generates ___something___ referred to as the exchange hash H" - in article which tries to sound technical and in fact in some parts goes into much details, this ___something___ is really funny :) * copy pasta description of forward secrecy, wrongly explaining why it is forwardly secure * wrong chain of events with lack of important diagram, while adding boilerplate :( p.s. amount of upvotes shows these days a lot of us click up before reading _whole_ article.