5 ms·

I think it would be really great if you slice these criticism into items and fill in issues! https://github.com/dilshan/usb2-power-hub/issues https://github.co

by Iv 7y ago

I think it would be really great if you slice these criticism into items and fill in issues! https://github.com/dilshan/usb2-power-hub/issues https://github.com/dilshan/usb2-power-hub/issues That's exactly why such a project benefits from being open source: someone with enough motivation and knowledge to hack something together do it, then other people with more specialized knowledge make suggestions for improvement.

mlyle 7y ago
Issues aren't really a great way to address core architectural questions that effectively say "I think it would be better to start over and build this in an entirely different way". There are some (small) benefits to independent regulators. A massive rail with high-side switches is a completely different design approach with its own benefits.
- Iv 7y ago
  The issue would be tagged "wish" or "for v2" and discussed. It can later be referenced when a design for a new release is being discussed. There are always better ways to handle discussions, but on a github issue on the project's repo is probably better than on a HN thread that won't be linked to it easily.