> else we are condemning a incredible big part of the population (and the voters) to die with nothing and that's not a viable political solution What makes yo

> else we are condemning a incredible big part of the population (and the voters) to die with nothing and that's not a viable political solution What makes you think this is untenable? For most of human history, most of the population have been peasants, slaves and serfs who died with nothing or less than nothing, leaving their children indebted to the same masters. It's entirely possible that the last 200 or so years of relative freedom and prosperity are the unsustainable anomaly.