3 ms·
We know empirically that the vast majority of people who make tens of millions of dollars from their business don't give almost all of it to charity. So if we c
by 55555 7y ago
We know empirically that the vast majority of people who make tens of millions of dollars from their business don't give almost all of it to charity. So if we can agree on any moral framework, then I think it's fair to say that Sivers is, at least in this way, a "better" person than most, as most in his situation don't act so "good".
- burntoutfire 7y ago> Sivers is, at least in this way, a "better" person than most Better than most who make millions, not than general population. Who knows, maybe the millionaires are "worse" than the average in this regard.