3 ms·
Why not set up some new national forests, parks, and wildlife reserves? https://thehill.com/regulation/lobbying/461860-trump-has-named-more-ex-lobbyists-to-cab
by aaronbrethorst 7y ago
Why not set up some new national forests, parks, and wildlife reserves?
https://thehill.com/regulation/lobbying/461860-trump-has-named-more-ex-lobbyists-to-cabinet-in-3-years-than-obama-bush https://thehill.com/regulation/lobbying/461860-trump-has-nam...
Specifically look at
EPA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_R._Wheeler#Lobbying,_2009–2018 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_R._Wheeler#Lobbying,_20...
and Interior: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bernhardt#Legal_work_and_lobbying https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bernhardt#Legal_work_and...
- bufferoverflow 7y agoWe can do that, but pesticides are in the air, in the rain.
- leggomylibro 7y agoYes, but aren't a lot of those pollutants localized? I was just at a national park which called out how air pollution was affecting lichens and other sensitive life in the area, but...the part of the park with informational hikes bordered a highway where huge trucks passed by every few minutes. We forbid offroad vehicles from driving through wetlands for this sort of reason; those environments are very sensitive to the pollution, noise, erosion, etc. But we put freeways damned near everywhere. I dunno. I agree, it doesn't seem like enough, but what can we do? Tear up all our roads and rebuild them on a carefully-planned "pollution grid"? And even then, the BLM allows grazing and hunting on most of their lands which is another deeply-ingrained tragedy of the commons. Good luck getting rid of those methane-rich cow farts in the area when everyone feeds their herds off of the 'free' land. And good luck keeping 4x4s away when hunting is allowed.