3 ms·
Daylight savings time neatly solves a nexus of several different problems - permanent daylight savings is, IMO, the superior choice. The problems: 1. A lot of
by ThrustVectoring 7y ago
Daylight savings time neatly solves a nexus of several different problems - permanent daylight savings is, IMO, the superior choice. The problems:
1. A lot of working parents are locked into a fixed start and end time and have little flexibility
2. These parents also rely on school for a significant amount of childcare, and need to be present in the house until their children get onto the bus at the least.
3. So, the school bus needs to show up before the parents leave to get to their 9am job
4. The school bus also needs to be driving during daylight hours for child safety.
5. If children are walking directly to school, this also needs to happen during daylight hours. This is both for traffic safety and for not having children get lost in the dark.
Permanent standard time would necessitate schools pushing their start time back roughly an hour, leading to millions of workers desperately attempting to re-negotiate their working hours with their employers.
- _ph_ 7y agoNo, permanent DST would cause schools to start later.
- ThrustVectoring 7y agoYou've got it backwards. Schools have an earliest solar time that they can start, given the daylight constraints on commuting. Losing the "fall back" of daylight savings time would cause this solar time to have a later clock time, which means that the school has to start at a later clock time in order to accommodate the correct solar time.