4 ms·
So what would be an effective way to fight wildfires then? Just clear brush, better fire resistant structure...or?
by newguy1234 7y ago
So what would be an effective way to fight wildfires then? Just clear brush, better fire resistant structure...or?
- biggestdecision 7y agoIt's not that aerial drops aren't effective. But the way they are used is sometimes more political than practical.
- angry_octet 7y agoIt may be a practically effective way to get news coverage, important for getting the public to move their ass out of the dangerous area. Not to mention a visible symbol requiring funding.
- mrexroad 7y agoI can’t help but think of analogy to engineering orgs where leadership places higher value on engineers whose highly visible “heroics” fix a mess they created in the first place, rather than the engineer that makes boring decisions that prevent the problems in the first place. I have zero knowledge or expertise in forest management or wildfire fighting, but I suspect there isn’t a simply a single method that’s more effective. Meaningful progress likely requires an interrelated system of measures spanning education, policy, understanding risk tolerances, prevention and response. But if expensive response measures — with low-efficacy — are taken primarily for political reasons, I’d love to see the political value shift to more boring proactive measures. With that said, I don’t have any understanding/data on efficacy of tankers, or what proactive measures would be more valuable, just thinking aloud.