3 ms·
http://headrush.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/04/06/dumbgroups2.jpg http://headrush.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/04/06/dumbgroups2.jpg Sersiou
by Goladus 20y ago
http://headrush.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/04/06/dumbgroups2.jpg http://headrush.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/04/06/dumbgroups2.jpg
Sersiouly though, it's a complicated issue and the suggestion to reject the proposal may simply be because it needs revision.
- gibsonf1 20y agoIf that were the case, why didn't they mention that, in principle, the proposal was good but needed to be revised which is why they recommended voting it down in its current form?
- Goladus 20y agoIf it were me, it would be to avoid clutter and confusion, as there are only two possible ways to vote. But that's just a guess.