5 ms·

I disagree. By having the browser implement these features we gain security. Chrome's sandbox is extremely powerful, and they can isolate and restrict all of th

I disagree. By having the browser implement these features we gain security. Chrome's sandbox is extremely powerful, and they can isolate and restrict all of those features you're describing very deliberately, in a way that a more generalized OS provided tool may not be able to.

jbk 7y ago
> I disagree. By having the browser implement these features we gain security. This is the opposite: this FFT and convolution code is in C++, and therefore OUTSIDE of the JS sandbox. My point is that there should be a minimum in C++ and MORE inside the JS sandbox.
- staticassertion 7y ago
  Browsers sandbox more than just the javascript VM/ renderer.
  - jbk 7y ago
    Obviously not the webaudio part, seeing this exploit.
    - staticassertion 7y ago
      There was likely a sandbox escape.