4 ms·
I think it's just interesting to a lot of the HN audience. A modal HN reader stumbled across the post, they found it interesting, they thought it would be good
by OldManAndTheCpp 7y ago
I think it's just interesting to a lot of the HN audience. A modal HN reader stumbled across the post, they found it interesting, they thought it would be good to post on HN, and it was.
I think it's interesting to the modal HN viewer because although FFTs are pretty neat intrinsically, but most people are exposed to FFTs through sound processing (if they are exposed to Fourier Transforms at all, I don't think they were a required part of the CS curriculum at my university, they were only required for the EE courses), so the application of FFTs to images seems like total magic.
The explanation that jpegs use FFTs is ho-hum if you spend a bunch of time doing signal processing at your day job, but there are many intellectually curious developers who spend their day job gluing together CRUD apps.
- arpa 7y agoIf I recall correctly, frequency anomalies also show image doctoring, ala photoshop?
- ChrisSD 7y agoOh undoubtedly it's interesting. But interesting things often go by with few votes. Often there's some reason it quickly gains the upvotes needed to appear of the front page. For example, if the topic is mentioned in another thread.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]