3 ms·
It's less the specifics and more the trend. Google's direction is, as stated elsewhere, to be seen as the source of information - not a route to it. As you no
by spinningslate 7y ago
It's less the specifics and more the trend. Google's direction is, as stated elsewhere, to be seen as the source of information - not a route to it. As you note, they're incentivising structured content - which means they can appropriate it and present directly rather than providing a link to the originator.
No doubt some will find it helpful (as with AMP). Some will find it unacceptable appropriation. I'm most definitely in the latter camp. I don't use Google search anymore, having transitioned to DDG 2+ years ago. I rarely find situations where reverting to Google is necessary, and when I do, a `g!` in DDG is as close as I get.
I realise I may be in a minority, but as far as I'm concerned both Google and Facebook have jumped the shark. They're become corporate behemoths, a malaise that seems to come to all companies of a certain age and scale. They've lost focus on providing useful, innovative services for real people. Instead, they're all about "shareholder value". Both are ripe for disruption.
- cartoonworld 7y agoI have recently noticed that to my eyes, Google search looks like physical junkmail marketing "Magazines". Google funnels me to products, services, and affilate marketing blogs, advertisements and their own paid ad placement. To Google, the internet is shopping, and maybe a least-common-denominator social network or two. Garbage. Google feels like going to the Mall anymore. Super sad, but as you have noticed the silver lining is the fabulous service of duck.com. If I were paying for google search with a credit card, I would cancel, and then call to stop payment. Too bad they never asked for my money.
- ddingus 7y ago"Everything is Search" --Google exec, whose name escapes me at the moment.