The real interesting question raised by this article is it points out the difference of innovation speed between traditional camera makers and phone makers. Wh

The real interesting question raised by this article is it points out the difference of innovation speed between traditional camera makers and phone makers. Why does such a difference exist? [edit]: Is it industry culture? Is it because the DSLR camera market is too small to finance the innovation? Is it lack of imagination? I mean the size of the DSLR platform lends itlsef to way more computing power / features than a smartphone with the huge constraint on size and power consumption.