4 ms·
The A6600 sensor first appeared on the A6300, actually, not the A6000, so it's "only" three years old. That said, they've bumped into the upper limits of image
by CarVac 7y ago
The A6600 sensor first appeared on the A6300, actually, not the A6000, so it's "only" three years old. That said, they've bumped into the upper limits of image quality; the newer 26MP sensor (which you'll find in the latest Fuji cameras) actually performs worse in low light than the preceding 24mp sensors.
>Imagine how many iPhones Apple would sell if the sensor were not much changed from the 6s and the camera software not changed at all.
Honestly, very little of the advances in cell phone cameras since the 6s have come from sensors; it's all computational. We're up against the brick wall that is photon noise.
Finally, the A6600 is very much not a flagship. The A9 II is the flagship, at three times the price ($4500).
- asdfasgasdgasdg 7y agoAnd, despite the a6600 not being a flagship, if the light is anything less than perfect, it will take pictures that are plainly higher in quality than anything coming out of a phone.
- kungito 7y agoPeople keep forgetting about sensor sizes and pretend like their tiny smartphone flagship can compensate with some smart extrapolation and fake bokeh
- flyinglizard 7y agoAlso, diffraction limits of smaller optics. All of that can be fixed to some extent computationally, but not in all situations (like moving subjects).