3 ms·

Does anyone honestly think that removing fb out of the equation would result in any kind of improvement? Or are people simply disgusted because this is happenin

• AzzieElbab 7y ago
  the problem is jurisdiction, in this case Kuwait, not freaking fb which in a matter of minutes can be replaced for alibaba or tictoc or something else you and bbc journas never heard of
• Nextgrid 7y ago
  It’s not like this is only happening in private - Shitbook is outright giving them a storefront for selling slaves. Now I agree that the problem can’t be 100% eliminated as at least some of it happens behind closed doors, but it would sure reduce the scale of this business if Shitbook & co weren’t around to provide a free platform for trading slaves in the open. They should be prosecuted for complicity and not be allowed to hide behind the excuse of the “algorithm”. If your algorithm isn’t good enough to filter out this behaviour then go back to the drawing board and find a better solution. Human moderation works pretty well on forums. Oh it doesn’t scale? Well that’s a shame but it’s not a right to be profitable - if you can’t figure out a sustainable business model then don’t be in business. It’s like starting a very cheap rental car business and stealing cars for your inventory because you can’t actually afford to buy them...
  • deleted 7y ago
    [deleted]
  • zepto 7y ago
    I suspect more people would read your comment and you would have fewer downvotes if you didn’t use the term ‘shitbook’.