> You yourself admit that it might not be flexible enough to evolve. I don't really think so, but I don't really know, I haven't every tried to do anything in

> You yourself admit that it might not be flexible enough to evolve. I don't really think so, but I don't really know, I haven't every tried to do anything in that direction. > It has certainly had a lot of time to try. Except that people have to do it? As far as I am concerned, IRC is good enough, so I don't feel like putting any effort into "improving" anything, and it seems like a lot of people using IRC feel this way. Those who feel it's not good enough, though, seem to prefer building non-interoperable systems or just using proprietary lock-in vendors. Obviously, that's not gonna result in anything new in IRC.