4 ms·
Yes it would be interesting to see if it extends to poorest 5% at least. However I would assume the poorest 1% would be covered by social security.
by ErikAugust 7y ago
Yes it would be interesting to see if it extends to poorest 5% at least.
However I would assume the poorest 1% would be covered by social security.
- dredmorbius 7y agoCovered by != having effective access to. The first is a legal and regulatory status. The second requires knowledge of, access to, capability of negotiating system(s), having a sufficiently fixed address, documentation, and numerous other factors.