4 ms·

Because your tunnel is not competing against a superior, dominant tunnel. EDIT: Also, the runner and eagle analogy seam to criticize the line of thinking that

• gniv 7y ago
  > assume you can just smash together two companies and end up with a company that is better than the current market leaders But you can. Think of regional phone companies (the baby bells), which merged and became dominant just by dent of natural monopoly. Anyway, my analogy is exactly the opposite of that critique. It's the optimist's view (which is also the view of the decision-makers at the companies, so it's not to be dismissed easily).
  • Rapzid 7y ago
    > you can just smash I think you may have glossed over the "just". Of course they "can" but it's not "ergo" in the sense that 1 + 1 = 2 ergo you are now better than the 1.5 company. I don't view the tunnel as being the optimistic antithesis of the turkey or runner analogy. The other two are not meant to be postulations pending mathematical proofs but critiques on simplistic thinking.