4 ms·
> Why should a person interacting within society have the option to opt out of surveillance? A non-exhaustive list of a few specific reasons: - Private, unreg
by danShumway 7y ago
> Why should a person interacting within society have the option to opt out of surveillance?
A non-exhaustive list of a few specific reasons:
- Private, unregulatable actions are historically large components of social change, particularly for minority groups.
- Historically, powerful groups (both governments and societies as a whole) have used surveillance to harass critics and undesirable parts of the population.
- People have a natural tendency to self-select and avoid honestly engaging with controversial ideas when they know they're being watched.
I tend to sum most of that up into a more general point:
People have the Right to Hide because society can be cruel, vindictive, and arbitrary, and because people have the right to protect themselves from others in the same way that a deer has the right to camouflage itself from wolves.
Opting out of society is not a real choice that anyone here can realistically take, so a just society must balance collective and individual rights. That means respecting individual rights of privacy and self-autonomy.
- swader999 7y agoYeah it would crush dissent, limit change, make us weaker as a species.
- shadowgovt 7y ago> Private, unregulatable actions are historically large components of social change, particularly for minority groups I agree but I'd note there's reasons not to maximize that effect universally. Some balance is important; the Klu Klux Klan in the US is a minority group. Apart from that, I generally agree with your assessment of the benefits of the ability to have a private life.