3 ms·

growth != success edit: not saying it didn't used to be, up to the 20th century it certainly was.

• Razengan 7y ago
  "Growth" = ?
  • wongarsu 7y ago
    Growth implies success, but you can be successful without growth. Just running a profitable business that's not losing market share is enough for most people's definition of success.
    • naringas 7y ago
      > Growth implies success there's a very famous counterexample, namely cancer. are there others?
    • Razengan 7y ago
      > Growth implies But what is growth? Making more money? More users? Happier users? After attaining profitability I wish companies would focus on making existing users happy, instead of making more money by any means necessary. If they did that then more users + more money would follow naturally. The sibling comment about cancer is so apt. When does "growth" become cancerous?