4 ms·
Appears to be based on this code: http://snipplr.com/view/29188/ http://snipplr.com/view/29188/ EDIT: actually, it might or might not be based on it, but that
by julian37 16y ago
Appears to be based on this code: http://snipplr.com/view/29188/ http://snipplr.com/view/29188/
EDIT: actually, it might or might not be based on it, but that code shows how to implement dynamic favicons, at least for Google Chrome.
Another edit: MikeCapone observed in another comment that it only goes up to "30+" so they might just be using 30 static images. But if so, why that wouldn't work in browsers other than Chrome 6+ and Firefox 2+ is beyond me.
- ggrot 16y agoJust guessing, but it's probably because most browsers heavily cache the favicon image.
- pasbesoin 16y agoActually, I was just wondering whether this means that Chrome is no longer going to do so.
- julian37 16y agoSurely it would be cached based on the image URL though, not based on the page URL, and different images could use different URLs. I still don't see how this would pose a problem.