4 ms·
There's really an enormous amount of hype around NFC, and the fact is that the readers are still really expensive. We've been operating on the assumption that b
by thinkcomp 16y ago
There's really an enormous amount of hype around NFC, and the fact is that the readers are still really expensive. We've been operating on the assumption that barcodes will prevail because they're about 10X cheaper to read, and the recent Starbucks nationwide rollout of barcode-based mobile payments supports that.
Also unless I'm missing something the Android 2.3 NFC spec is pretty incomplete. It lets you read an NFC tag with a phone but not broadcast as though your phone were a tag. This means that you can't really do mobile payments after all (again, I might be missing something obvious, but I don't think so). Hopefully if this really is an omission it will get resolved with the next release of Android. For now there's not a whole lot we can do with it.
Anyway, NFC is great, but in reality scanning a barcode isn't that much harder or faster, and it's certainly cheaper--it's been working at grocery stores for years.
- cosgroveb 16y agoI think the hype around NFC is for payment applications.
- evgen 16y agoThe difference between NFC and barcodes or RFID is that the former uses induction between the tag and reader and the tag can modulate the signal it is returning. In short, two-way communication between tag and reader and not just one-way data delivery. The current Android spec is only half of a NFC solution but most of the rumors so far indicate that Apple is going the full distance and the new hardware will be able to act as both a tag and a reader. If this turns out to be true then there are a lot more possibilities that this will open up.