3 ms·
Eventually. First you have to pay for your training. If you want to work for a major airline you also need a college degree. After that, you become a flight
by cameldrv 7y ago
Eventually. First you have to pay for your training. If you want to work for a major airline you also need a college degree. After that, you become a flight instructor and earn $20-30k and rack up some flight time. You then need to spend several years coming up with 1500 hours of flight time, either through instructing, flying charters, or simply paying to rent a plane. If you need to pay to rent or buy the plane, you're looking at $80k minimum to get buy the final 1000 hours.
Assuming the economy is doing well, you can go get a regional airline job. Today it will pay $40k to start, but if the economy falters, there will be an excess of pilots, and those that are lucky enough to have an airline job will be getting $25k like they used to.
Finally, after some years of this, you'll move to a major airline and start finally making good money. All the while, you're often away from your family, living an unhealthy lifestyle, exposed to radiation, and if you ever have any significant illness or require most any medication, your career is over, and you have to apply all of those jet pilot skills to something else.
If you're 18 and starting your training today, you have 47 years to retirement, and it's very likely that less than half way through your career, automation and remote piloting will have advanced enough that many planes will only require one pilot, causing a collapse in the demand for airline pilots and wrecking salaries.
But hey, you get to fly for a living!
- mantap 7y agoThere's no chance that automation will advance such that you only need one pilot. The pilots job is to babysit the machine, hardware and software. And you need two for the obvious reason that sometimes one is incapacitated. More complex software increases the need for two pilots.
- cjrp 7y ago> And you need two for the obvious reason that sometimes one is incapacitated See the new Garmin/Cirrus/Piper "autoland" feature. Obviously GA is very different from Commercial, but there are definitely people in the industry working on this.
- cameldrv 7y agoAirbus is openly working on it. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/28/airbus-pushing-ahead-in-tech-as-it-aims-for-single-pilot-planes-cto.html https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/28/airbus-pushing-ahead-in-tech... If you go back to the 1940s, some big aircraft had five flight crew for long-range flights. They progressively dropped the navigator, then the flight engineer in the 80s, because computers could do their jobs. Many small business jets already can fly legally with a single pilot. When automation reaches the point that the computer can fly the entire flight, and the pilot merely needs to monitor, as we are close to with this new Garmin autoland system, the pilot incapacitation argument for having two crew members goes away. It's inevitable and just a matter of time.
- throw0101a 7y agoThere are some strange corner cases out there: > Already requested and had the data linked chart for our landing weight sent up to the aircraft: we require 5,671 feet on a wet runway, good braking, zero tailwind. Each knot of tailwind adds 150 to the distance required, so even one knot of tailwind exceeds the runway length. * https://jethead.wordpress.com/2014/12/13/flying-a-jet-in-the-los-angeles-storms-december-12-2014/ https://jethead.wordpress.com/2014/12/13/flying-a-jet-in-the...
- cameldrv 7y agoInteresting story, but the FMS already can calculate the required distances in various scenarios. I'm not aware of an FMS that can do the what-if type analysis automatically about the range of acceptable wind directions and speeds, but that can certainly be built. Instead of the F/O flying the approach, he could simply have let the autopilot do the whole thing and focus himself, as he did, on the strategic aspects of the flight.