3 ms·
Of course she can have it both ways. Don’t be stupid. There’s plenty to do in physics without building an even bigger collider which likely won’t teach us more
by Ma8ee 7y ago
Of course she can have it both ways. Don’t be stupid. There’s plenty to do in physics without building an even bigger collider which likely won’t teach us more than the current one.
- pas 7y agoplenty to do, such as? also, she can't wish away the fact that without data any new theories are worthless, even if someone conveniently comes up with one. also, saying that the LHC haven't taught us anything ignores the reality of all the data that it has generated. is it shiny "new" physics? no, but it's a crucial prerequisite for that. particle physics needs new data for new physics eventually.