> Quitting on moral grounds is a luxury in the scope of human history So what? Freedom of speech is a luxury in the scope of human history as well. Moreover,

> Quitting on moral grounds is a luxury in the scope of human history So what? Freedom of speech is a luxury in the scope of human history as well. Moreover, someone is making these choices. If it's within your power to have an effect on the choice, and one choice is more moral in your estimation, you're practically obliged to act, even if other people don't have that power.