All these people are saying is "I don't want people using things I make for (what I perceive to be) evil". Aside from the compensation, anything you have impli

All these people are saying is "I don't want people using things I make for (what I perceive to be) evil". Aside from the compensation, anything you have implied beyond this is just augmentation derived from capitalism and acceptance of the status quo. Saying "I don't like what you are doing with the thing I am producing for you, so I may stop offering you services" is just...basic human communication. I really can't see how there is any more to this? You speak with such absolute authority ("You have to let certain control go after a point."). However, this story (and others like it) are proof that this is untrue. Your assertion is false. Just because somebody is an employee, it does not mean they lose all bargaining power / agency. If you are exchanging goods or services with someone else in a scenario where the power dynamic is not entirely one-sided, there is always room for negotiation. This is all that's happening. Just because you don't care about how your stuff is used, doesn't mean that it applies to everyone.