4 ms·

I'd argue in this sense, Windows won: it was never bested by Linux on the desktop, even though it is now largely irrelevant. And what made it irrelevant? The

• cynest 16y ago
  His point still stands somewhat. Windows won by maintaining control of the OS market, though the OS market became less directly relevant due to the fact that the web became the dominant force in commercial computing.
  • michaelchisari 16y ago
    That irrelevance is exactly what I'm referring to. Sometimes it doesn't come in the form of a direct competitor. Sometimes, open protocols route around walled gardens. It may not be a Facebook clone built in a distributed fashion that forces Facebook to open up, it may instead be a whole new approach to social applications that nobody's thought of yet. That's fine.
• stoney 16y ago
  I'd say it's a bit early to call Windows irrelevant - certainly one look at Microsoft's bottom line would suggest that Windows is still very relevant. In some ways, yes, the choice of operating system is now largely irrelevant - if you mainly use web based stuff. But then again, walk into any corporate office in the world and there is a massive, massive probability that the only operating system you will see on desktops is Windows.
  • edanm 16y ago
    And also a massive probability that everyone there is running Office, plus a bunch of internal applications written specifically for that office, which only work on Windows.