I mostly agree. Twitter is a private company and is free to do what they want. What I don’t agree is the CEO making the argument that he is protecting democracy

I mostly agree. Twitter is a private company and is free to do what they want. What I don’t agree is the CEO making the argument that he is protecting democracy. He is protecting his business. I strongly agree that adding more information to the system (like making ads metadata open) is good for the society as a whole and might lead to better decisions, as in decisions supported by better data. I don’t agree with the regulator idea, though. How do we make this regulator strong enough to resist corruption? It’s a tough job.