4 ms·
> It's even worse when you consider how it's based in binary gender thinking. More like even better. Glad to see a website exercising critical thinking. > Are
by mieseratte 7y ago
> It's even worse when you consider how it's based in binary gender thinking.
More like even better. Glad to see a website exercising critical thinking.
> Are a transgender person's nipples allowed, or not?
Is it sexually suggestive? Then no.
> A gender-neutral standard would be better.
Well that's a policy ignorant of reality.
- amanaplanacanal 7y agoWhat reality is that I wonder?
- marton78 7y agoThe only one there is. The one we're living in.
- mieseratte 7y agoThe reality of two genders.
- notacoward 7y ago> Glad to see a website exercising critical thinking. So "critical thinking" to you means rejecting the notion of gender being anything but binary and static, despite scientific evidence to the contrary? Interesting definition you've got there. > Is it sexually suggestive? Nope, no subjective opinions or controversial judgment calls there. > that's a policy ignorant of reality. It's a policy that doesn't allow neanderthals to deny others' reality, and IMO the fact that it makes those neanderthals uncomfortable is a bonus.
- apta 7y ago> despite scientific evidence to the contrary? Science says that there are two main genders: XX (female) and XY (male), with other disorders that are quite rare (e.g. XXY, XYY, etc.). Anything else are mental disorders and should be treated as such, not cave in to the latest fad of the day.