4 ms·
It’s not just Europe though. For example Australia has similar sensibilities too. Maybe a more accurate description might be: countries predominantly atheist v
by pushpop 7y ago
It’s not just Europe though. For example Australia has similar sensibilities too.
Maybe a more accurate description might be: countries predominantly atheist verses countries which are not.
Regardless of you want to define it, a female nipple is still no more offensive than a male one.
- mieseratte 7y ago> Regardless of you want to define it, a female nipple is still no more offensive than a male one. That's your subjective opinion.
- amanaplanacanal 7y agoAren’t they pretty much the same thing? It’s just the bodies they are attached to are different. I suppose anybody could theoretically be offended by anything.
- pushpop 7y agoI find it crazy that we, as a society, campaign for equality in one breath then invent completely fictional biological differences in the next.
- pushpop 7y agoMaybe; but it’s an educated one. People who see a distinction are operating on outdated and sexist sensibilities rather than tackling the anatomical differences behind the distinction. What if the girl is masculine and is flat chested and has short hair, is that then ok? Or what if a man has gynecomastia, should his nipples then be covered? Literally the only reasons people make a distinction is because they’re taught it’s different; but it isn’t.
- mieseratte 7y ago> Maybe; but it’s an educated one. No, it's your subjective one. Nothing educated about it.