3 ms·
I agree with the first part of this, but not the second. We (I'm a scientist more than a hacker, although both) do not have "very effective methods of communica
by abrax3141 7y ago
I agree with the first part of this, but not the second. We (I'm a scientist more than a hacker, although both) do not have "very effective methods of communication". We have extremely inefficient methods of communication. (The traditional explanation for this is quality control, but it's been shown that this is mostly an illusion, and anyway there are more efficient means of QC than peer review.)
- billconan 7y agohow about https://www.researchgate.net/ https://www.researchgate.net/?
- abrax3141 7y agoInterestingly, everyone I know treats this as just a way to get free papers. There's something about its design that says "free papers", as opposed to "form community". Like, maybe it's logo: "Discover scientific knowledge, and make your research visible."
- buboard 7y agospammier than linkedin