3 ms·
Because that's all they're capable of doing with it. Games can be easily repeated, have clear outcomes. There's no need for nuanced thinking or actual problem
by linuxftw 7y ago
Because that's all they're capable of doing with it. Games can be easily repeated, have clear outcomes. There's no need for nuanced thinking or actual problem-solving. Just approximate the current scenario against previously successful strategies and pursue that strategy.
A real challenge would be to invent a new game, have both a human and an "AI" read the rules for the first time, and then compete in their first game together. Would the "AI" be able to formulate a winning strategy without historical data? If not, then it's not "AI."
- sinuhe69 7y agoThere is no deep learning without massive data. What do you expect? :D
- linuxftw 7y agoI expect less hype and more substance. I don't think computers beating people at video games (or really, any games) is particularly novel at this point, nor do I think it qualifies as "AI".
- chillacy 7y ago> Just approximate the current scenario against previously successful strategies and pursue that strategy. Just about sums up business school.