5 ms·

I think society has shown that it only works sometimes. The biggest example in recent history was the kneeling movement in the NFL and the NFL's stance of blac

I think society has shown that it only works sometimes. The biggest example in recent history was the kneeling movement in the NFL and the NFL's stance of blacklisting and penalizing prominent players won. Similarly with the NBA, player agents have indicated an overwhelming support by players to NOT speak out for fear of losing their endorsements from Nike, Adidas, Anta, and other firms deeply embedded in the Chinese industrial complex. Even with the Commissioner coming out in favor of voicing the issues, its the big stars the fans care about and without them there will be a significantly fewer repercussions.

dickeytk 7y ago
> The biggest example in recent history was the kneeling movement in the NFL and the NFL's stance of blacklisting and penalizing prominent players won. Did it? I'm genuinely asking and seeing contradicting results trying to search. At least super bowl stats look like they've lost quite a bit. [anecdata] I know myself I quit watching football as a result of that and the injuries.
gamblor956 7y ago
Citation needed, since all reporting has said the opposite. Players want to be able to speak freely. Many of them have started their support for the Hong Kong protests.
- in3d 7y ago
  Players such as? Lebron James certainly wasn’t for the protests or players supporting them.
  - trophycase 7y ago
    Lebron James is a moron. Remember the part of his statement where he claimed that many people had been physically hurt by Morey's words?
  - gamblor956 7y ago
    Ah today I learned that Lebron James is so big he counts as multiple players. But seriously, where are the citations that multiple players support censorship, let alone NBA players in general? Because the reporting on ESPN and CBS Sports is the exact opposite--players may choose the remain apolitical with respect to Hong Kong but want the right to speak out if they choose.
gameswithgo 7y ago
>and the NFL's stance of blacklisting and penalizing prominent players won. We don't know what would have been the result if the NFL had simply ignored the whole thing and let the players peacefully protest. A lot of effort was put forth by the NFL and the president to get people angry about that before they shut it down. Maybe don't do that.
overgard 7y ago
Not sure I'd say the NFL won. If anything their reaction prolonged something that probably would have passed quickly on its own if they had let it play out. In the end they came out of it looking really bad. The players didn't "win" necessarily, but I'm not sure if there was ever a criteria by which they could have won. The goals of the protest were too diffuse. I guess the main goal was awareness of police violence, but the people that needed to hear it the most immediately pretended it was about something else (the troops, patriotism, etc.). I think with what's happening in the NBA, the truth is a lot of these "woke" individuals are only woke as long as it doesn't affect their business interests. It is what it is. This isn't a new thing.

dickeytk 7y ago

> The biggest example in recent history was the kneeling movement in the NFL and the NFL's stance of blacklisting and penalizing prominent players won. Did it? I'm genuinely asking and seeing contradicting results trying to search. At least super bowl stats look like they've lost quite a bit. [anecdata] I know myself I quit watching football as a result of that and the injuries.

gamblor956 7y ago

Citation needed, since all reporting has said the opposite. Players want to be able to speak freely. Many of them have started their support for the Hong Kong protests.

in3d 7y ago
Players such as? Lebron James certainly wasn’t for the protests or players supporting them.
- trophycase 7y ago
  Lebron James is a moron. Remember the part of his statement where he claimed that many people had been physically hurt by Morey's words?
- gamblor956 7y ago
  Ah today I learned that Lebron James is so big he counts as multiple players. But seriously, where are the citations that multiple players support censorship, let alone NBA players in general? Because the reporting on ESPN and CBS Sports is the exact opposite--players may choose the remain apolitical with respect to Hong Kong but want the right to speak out if they choose.

gameswithgo 7y ago

>and the NFL's stance of blacklisting and penalizing prominent players won. We don't know what would have been the result if the NFL had simply ignored the whole thing and let the players peacefully protest. A lot of effort was put forth by the NFL and the president to get people angry about that before they shut it down. Maybe don't do that.

overgard 7y ago

Not sure I'd say the NFL won. If anything their reaction prolonged something that probably would have passed quickly on its own if they had let it play out. In the end they came out of it looking really bad. The players didn't "win" necessarily, but I'm not sure if there was ever a criteria by which they could have won. The goals of the protest were too diffuse. I guess the main goal was awareness of police violence, but the people that needed to hear it the most immediately pretended it was about something else (the troops, patriotism, etc.). I think with what's happening in the NBA, the truth is a lot of these "woke" individuals are only woke as long as it doesn't affect their business interests. It is what it is. This isn't a new thing.