2 ms·
he didn't say that because of "free speech" , he gave a specific reason for why he thinks they should be allowed. He didn't say its because anyone should be abl
by dominotw 7y ago
he didn't say that because of "free speech" , he gave a specific reason for why he thinks they should be allowed. He didn't say its because anyone should be able to say anything.
If his argument was "free speech" he wouldn't have had to support it with "so they can get their message into debates". Why would "free speech" require supporting evidence.
Looks like you are the one doing the conflation :D .