> They either had natural talent, were more intelligent, or some combination of the both. I highly disagree, and it is most likely because their mental models

> They either had natural talent, were more intelligent, or some combination of the both. I highly disagree, and it is most likely because their mental models are better than yours. I recommend you to read Peak[1] to better understand "natural talent". [1] Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise by K. Anders Ericsson, Robert Pool